Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06790

in Torrington, ConnecticutPopulation 35,566

55.15/ 100

Ranked #9,278 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #220 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

84.5%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

364 units

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0.00012 ppb

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

US9th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.11 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Torrington, Connecticut (ZIP 06790), overall, ranks in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,278th) and the bottom 21% of Connecticut (220th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled expected annual loss lands at the national minimum. Distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 6.6% nationally, and physicians rests in the top 9.0% nationally. Lead in tap water registers in the bottom 9.4% nationally, and mental-health providers resides in the top 9.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Park land is in the top 11.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled pfas lands in the top 1.1% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 06057, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.7 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $70,912 predicts 78.7 years — 1.1 years below.

    Ranked #1,490 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.7 ± 1.0 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.4 years — 3.8 years below them.

    Ranked #2,895 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.9%26.4–31.8
High blood pressure among adults32.5%29.6–35.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.6–10.3
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.3–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.5
Depression among adults22.4%19.7–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.5–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%36.2–42.9
Obesity among adults30.2%25.8–35.5
Stroke among adults3.7%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.3%11.0–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%9.0–11.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.8–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%77.2–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.6–90.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%64.3–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.5–67.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%69.4–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%13.1–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%11.8–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.1%24.8–32.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%30.0–38.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%17.1–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.3–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.5–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%12.3–15.4
Any disability among adults28.8%25.9–32.3
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.5–8.1
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.6–9.4
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.2–15.7
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.1%23.0–29.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.1–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.5–14.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.6–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.4–9.4
Loneliness among adults32.0%28.4–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–649.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)10.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle8.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate66.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population14.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households49.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+19.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$70,912$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$215,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,169$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 0.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.50 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured