Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03044

in Fremont, New HampshirePopulation 4,831

59.04/ 100

Ranked #5,566 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #138 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #205 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

0.4 mi

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$120,781

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.0%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

51.8%

in the top 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

19.6%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Fremont, New Hampshire (ZIP 03044) sits in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,566th) and the bottom 43% of New Hampshire (138th).

continue reading

Where this area does well, the measures make it plain: elder services lands in the top 6.7% nationally, and fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Household income settles in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness is in the bottom 11.6% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Against that, distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and modeled arsenic registers in the top 10.3% nationally. Modeled pfas lands in the top 12.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 03036, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.5%24.8–30.3
High blood pressure among adults35.2%32.0–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.0–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.0–7.8
Depression among adults23.1%20.1–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.0–10.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%33.9–40.0
Obesity among adults32.6%27.9–37.4
Stroke among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.6–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%4.5–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.4%73.2–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.5–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.4%87.4–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.9%66.5–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.8%67.0–72.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.9%73.8–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.6–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%8.8–14.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%16.1–23.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.5%30.8–38.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.0%11.3–17.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.4–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.3–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%9.8–14.1
Any disability among adults25.3%21.5–29.5
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.1–8.1
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.2–7.7
Mobility disability among adults10.9%8.8–13.2
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.4–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.3–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.0–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.4–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.2–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.4–6.6
Loneliness among adults28.7%25.1–32.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.4–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–646.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription95.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate90.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+21.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age44.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$120,781$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$416,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$2,668$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 1.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured