Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01721

in Ashland, MassachusettsPopulation 18,873

66.95/ 100

Ranked #1,296 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 4.1%)

Ranked #82 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #74 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

84.7%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST70th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Park land

21.1%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.4%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$127,539

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST68th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.0%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.5%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.1%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.3%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Ashland, Massachusetts (ZIP 01721) sits in the top 4.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,296th) and the top 16% of Massachusetts (82nd).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled mammography rests in the top 0.8% nationally, modeled obesity settles in the bottom 4.2% nationally, and park land lands in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled colon screening rests in the top 4.0% nationally, household income settles in the top 7.6% nationally, and modeled food insecurity lands in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and high blood pressure settles in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Against that, distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 01745, just across the boundary. Across other measures, the ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.8 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $127,539 predicts 81.0 years — 2.7 years above.

    Ranked #545 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.3%22.4–26.4
High blood pressure among adults28.1%25.9–30.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%8.0–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.4–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.4–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Depression among adults24.1%21.8–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%33.3–38.7
Obesity among adults24.0%21.0–27.4
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.8%4.7–7.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.2%2.7–3.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.8%71.0–76.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.6–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults92.0%91.0–93.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.4%71.6–77.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.2%74.0–78.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.7%81.1–88.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%14.7–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.0%7.7–10.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.0%15.0–19.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%27.9–34.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.5%11.2–14.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%13.2–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults10.1%9.0–11.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.4%10.3–12.7
Any disability among adults23.1%20.9–25.4
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Mobility disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.2–2.6
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%18.4–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.9–9.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.5–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.1–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Loneliness among adults32.8%29.8–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)2.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)60.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate75.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population23.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households50.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+18.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age42.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$127,539$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$611,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$2,452$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.7 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 83.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured