ZIP code
02815
in Clayville, Rhode IslandPopulation 161
59.97/ 100
Ranked #4,889 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15%)
Ranked #42 of 77 Rhode Island ZIPs (bottom 45%)
Ranked #54 of 112 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA ZIPs (top 48%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
86.6%
in the top 0.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
76.2%
in the top 1.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST76thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
81%
in the top 4.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Median household income
$126,071
in the top 7.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST81stUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 8.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS9thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 9.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS10thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
95.8%
in the top 9.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS90thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›The read
Clayville, Rhode Island (ZIP 02815), by its overall standing, sits in the top 15% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,889th) and the bottom 45% of Rhode Island (42nd).
The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled mammography lands in the top 0.2% nationally, poverty is at the national minimum, and homeownership resides at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription rests at the national maximum, modeled colon screening lies in the top 1.7% nationally, and modeled tree cover sits in the top 4.6% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Household income registers in the top 7.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss lands in the bottom 8.6% nationally.
Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 02857, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Providence-Warwick, RI-MA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 74%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 62%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.5%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 62%
11%
Disability
healthier than 81%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 82%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 59%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 49%
8%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 37%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 83%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 89%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 88%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 58%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 47%
8%
Disability
healthier than 50%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 20%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 78%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 92%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 92%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 57%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 52%
8%
Disability
healthier than 54%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 28%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 32%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
02825
Rhode Islandshares a border
Score 59.11
Closest healthier
02857
Rhode Islandshares a border
Score 60.63
Similar health profile
01036
Massachusetts97% similar profile
Score 59.27
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 27.6% | 24.6–30.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 35.5% | 31.9–39.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.3% | 8.4–10.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.6% | 11.2–14.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.4% | 5.6–7.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.8% | 5.4–8.4 |
| Depression among adults | 23.8% | 20.7–27.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.0% | 9.4–12.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 37.2% | 33.9–40.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 33.0% | 27.9–38.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.1% | 2.6–3.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 12.2% | 10.1–14.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.5% | 3.4–5.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.1% | 76.0–82.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 85.2% | 82.7–87.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 92.7% | 91.3–93.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 76.2% | 72.7–79.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 75.2% | 72.4–77.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 86.6% | 82.9–89.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.1% | 14.9–19.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.3% | 9.4–15.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.0% | 18.7–27.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.0% | 31.6–40.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.3% | 12.6–18.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.4% | 14.1–18.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.7% | 11.6–16.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.3% | 10.2–14.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 25.7% | 21.9–30.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.4–7.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.0% | 5.7–8.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.8% | 9.7–14.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.3% | 2.7–3.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.1–4.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.9% | 17.8–24.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.9% | 8.4–14.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.8% | 7.1–13.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.5% | 8.3–12.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.0% | 4.9–7.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.8% | 29.0–36.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.8% | 5.5–8.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | RI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.7% (0.0–17.9%) n=77 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 3.7% (0.0–9.3%) n=77 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 34.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.9% (1.2–17.4%) n=77 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 37.8% (20.4–68.2%) n=77 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.5% (0.0–8.3%) n=77 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.1%) n=77 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.3% (87.7–100.0%) n=77 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 36.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 29.7% (18.9–42.2%) n=77 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.7% (38.8–95.1%) n=77 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.5% (0.0–4.1%) n=77 |
| Foreign-born population | 11.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 6.9% (1.6–20.3%) n=77 |
| Single-parent households | 63.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 56.0% (35.9–70.5%) n=75 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.1% (10.7–35.3%) n=77 |
| Median age | 51.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 44.0 yr (34.6–53.3) n=76 |
| Median household income | $126,071 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $102,118 ($62,908–$137,181) n=71 |
| Median home value | $421,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $411,900 ($336,020–$633,580) n=73 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,374 ($1,168–$1,781) n=59 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | RI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.5 yr ± 1.73 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.2 yr (77.8–83.6) n=72 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.73 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured