Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02804

in Ashaway, Rhode IslandPopulation 2,609

62.07/ 100

Ranked #3,484 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.9%)

Ranked #30 of 77 Rhode Island ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #34 of 112 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

83.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.36 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.1%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST20th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.4%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST44th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.72 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

11.8 mi

in the top 11.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.9%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.1%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

23 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Ashaway, Rhode Island (ZIP 02804) sits in the top 10.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,484th) and the top 39% of Rhode Island (30th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: mental-health providers lands in the top 1.5% nationally, home broadband subscription resides at the national maximum, and modeled mammography lies in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the top 4.0% nationally, and civic stands in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health sits in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the bottom 11.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled pfas lands in the top 1.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 02808, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Providence-Warwick, RI-MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.5–30.3
High blood pressure among adults33.5%30.0–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Depression among adults22.9%19.6–26.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.4%30.7–37.8
Obesity among adults29.3%24.0–34.5
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%6.8–10.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.0–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.2–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.0%82.1–87.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%88.8–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.4%70.3–78.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.9%70.7–77.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.1%76.7–86.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.3–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%9.8–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.1%15.9–22.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%29.0–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.9%11.9–16.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.5–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.6–13.9
Any disability among adults24.2%21.0–27.7
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.4
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.7
Mobility disability among adults10.5%9.1–12.2
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.0%16.3–21.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.5–11.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.8–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.8–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Loneliness among adults29.1%25.4–32.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (0.0–17.9%) n=77
Uninsured 18–642.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2863.7% (0.0–9.3%) n=77
No HS diploma (25+)1.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (1.2–17.4%) n=77
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.8% (20.4–68.2%) n=77
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–8.3%) n=77
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.1%) n=77
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (87.7–100.0%) n=77
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.7% (18.9–42.2%) n=77
Homeownership rate83.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (38.8–95.1%) n=77
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.1%) n=77
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.9% (1.6–20.3%) n=77
Single-parent households64.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.0% (35.9–70.5%) n=75
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.1% (10.7–35.3%) n=77
Median age44.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.0 yr (34.6–53.3) n=76
Median household income$102,118$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$102,118 ($62,908–$137,181) n=71
Median home value$355,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$411,900 ($336,020–$633,580) n=73
Median gross rent$1,604$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,374 ($1,168–$1,781) n=59
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.8–83.6) n=72

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured