Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02832

in Hope Valley, Rhode IslandPopulation 4,998

61.52/ 100

Ranked #3,791 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.9%)

Ranked #33 of 77 Rhode Island ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #40 of 112 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

75%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75.3%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST59th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.6%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST26th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

10.6 mi

in the top 13.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.6 pCi/L

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hope Valley, Rhode Island (ZIP 02832) ranks in the top 11.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,791st) and the top 43% of Rhode Island (33rd).

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: recreation lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled colon screening is in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the top 2.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes lies in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription lies in the top 13.1% nationally, modeled tree cover is in the top 13.1% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 13.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas lies in the top 3.1% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 02804, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Providence-Warwick, RI-MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.3%25.1–31.1
High blood pressure among adults34.6%30.9–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.2–8.4
Depression among adults23.0%19.6–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.3–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%31.6–38.7
Obesity among adults29.6%24.1–34.7
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.9%8.0–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.3–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%74.5–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.3%82.5–87.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%89.1–91.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.3%71.4–79.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.0%68.7–75.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.6%77.2–87.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.7–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.3–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.6%16.3–23.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.0%29.2–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.0%12.8–17.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.4–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.1–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%10.7–14.2
Any disability among adults24.9%21.5–28.2
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.0
Mobility disability among adults11.3%9.6–12.9
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%16.4–22.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.2–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.6–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.2–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.7
Loneliness among adults28.9%25.3–32.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (0.0–17.9%) n=77
Uninsured 18–641.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2863.7% (0.0–9.3%) n=77
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (1.2–17.4%) n=77
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.8% (20.4–68.2%) n=77
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–8.3%) n=77
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.1%) n=77
Broadband subscription96.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (87.7–100.0%) n=77
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.7% (18.9–42.2%) n=77
Homeownership rate79.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (38.8–95.1%) n=77
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.1%) n=77
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.9% (1.6–20.3%) n=77
Single-parent households56.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.0% (35.9–70.5%) n=75
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.1% (10.7–35.3%) n=77
Median age42.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.0 yr (34.6–53.3) n=76
Median household income$105,976$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$102,118 ($62,908–$137,181) n=71
Median home value$432,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$411,900 ($336,020–$633,580) n=73
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,374 ($1,168–$1,781) n=59
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.8–83.6) n=72

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured