Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02543

in Woods Hole, MassachusettsPopulation 747

69.56/ 100

Ranked #672 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.1%)

Ranked #48 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 9.2%)

Ranked #1 of 47 Barnstable Town, MA ZIPs (top 2.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.09% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

80.6%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

5.9%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.5%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.5%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.3%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Woods Hole, Massachusetts (ZIP 02543) lands in the top 2.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (672nd) and the top 9.2% of Massachusetts (48th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: childcare lands in the top 0.09% nationally, mental-health providers lies in the top 0.2% nationally, and outpatient stands in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled colon screening rests in the top 0.2% nationally, recreation registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity settles in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and obesity is in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Civic sits in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled transportation lands in the bottom 2.6% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, childcare runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. No nearby ZIP ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Barnstable Town, MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.4%29.0–35.8
High blood pressure among adults35.3%31.6–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.2%12.0–14.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.1–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.6%4.4–7.2
Depression among adults21.4%18.4–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%7.7–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%35.1–42.4
Obesity among adults23.5%19.1–28.4
Stroke among adults3.2%2.7–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.1%4.0–6.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years2.8%2.1–4.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.5%79.9–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.9%82.4–87.1
Cholesterol screening among adults93.0%91.6–94.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years80.6%77.1–83.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults77.4%74.5–79.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.6%76.9–87.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.6–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.5%5.6–10.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.0%11.7–18.8
Short sleep duration among adults28.5%23.9–33.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.4%10.0–15.3
Frequent mental distress among adults12.4%10.6–14.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%9.5–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.6%8.0–11.7
Any disability among adults24.4%20.4–28.8
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.8
Independent living disability among adults5.5%4.4–6.7
Mobility disability among adults10.9%8.8–13.5
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.0–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.5–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%15.8–22.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.4–7.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.3%4.6–8.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.4–6.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.5–5.2
Loneliness among adults28.8%25.0–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.1–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)86.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription97.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate79.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population16.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households93.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+66.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age68.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$72,349$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$925,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,287$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.7 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 82.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured