Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02638

in Dennis, MassachusettsPopulation 3,253

65.28/ 100

Ranked #1,893 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.0%)

Ranked #120 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #11 of 47 Barnstable Town, MA ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

81.3%

in the top 0.09% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.3%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.0%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.0%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.6%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.2%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST40th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.34 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Dennis, Massachusetts (ZIP 02638) lands in the top 6.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,893rd) and the top 23% of Massachusetts (120th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled colon screening rests in the top 0.09% nationally, housing insecurity registers in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and food insecurity resides in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Modeled transportation settles in the bottom 1.6% nationally, utility shutoff is in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and obesity sits in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Modeled mammography lands in the top 2.1% nationally, and elder services lies in the top 3.9% nationally. Lead in tap water stands at the national minimum, and modeled short sleep rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. On the overall standing, ZIP 02675, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Barnstable Town, MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.04%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 99%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.9; chronic-disease standing 28.6 — 61 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,636 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.8%35.9–43.7
High blood pressure among adults41.7%37.5–46.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults16.1%14.6–17.7
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.0–8.9
Depression among adults20.8%17.8–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%9.5–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.5%39.4–47.6
Obesity among adults24.7%19.9–29.9
Stroke among adults4.1%3.5–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%7.7–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years2.9%2.3–3.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.9%83.3–88.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults87.7%85.6–89.7
Cholesterol screening among adults95.0%94.2–95.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years81.3%77.5–84.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.5%73.6–79.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.2%77.4–88.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%10.0–14.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.0%7.1–11.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.4%14.8–22.5
Short sleep duration among adults28.4%23.7–33.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.6%12.0–17.3
Frequent mental distress among adults11.9%10.3–13.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.3–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.7%8.2–11.4
Any disability among adults28.6%24.2–33.1
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.6
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.2–7.3
Mobility disability among adults14.2%11.7–16.9
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.0–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.6%16.6–22.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.7–7.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.2–8.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.3–6.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Loneliness among adults28.4%24.4–32.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.6%3.0–4.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)0.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription97.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate87.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population6.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households64.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+42.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age60.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$108,726$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$827,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,208$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 1.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.56 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured