Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02445

in Brookline, MassachusettsPopulation 22,560

72.20/ 100

Ranked #251 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.8%)

Ranked #13 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 2.5%)

Ranked #13 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 4.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

86.7%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

20.8%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

22%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.7%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

24.6%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

9.9%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.0%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$139,747

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

180 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 02445, one of several in Brookline, Massachusetts stands in the top 0.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (251st) and the top 2.5% of Massachusetts (13th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled mammography rests in the top 0.10% nationally, and obesity lands in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lands in the bottom 0.7% nationally, modeled mobility disability settles in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and household income rests in the top 5.2% nationally. Walkability lands in the top 3.5% nationally. By contrast, modeled transportation noise settles in the top 2.1% nationally, and loud transportation noise rests in the top 2.6% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, walkability runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 02459, about 1.2 miles away, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.8 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $139,747 predicts 81.4 years — 1.4 years above.

    Ranked #1,314 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 14.5; chronic-disease standing 96.9 (top 10%) — 82 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,366 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.8%18.8–22.9
High blood pressure among adults24.6%22.1–27.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Depression among adults21.7%19.1–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.5%29.6–35.4
Obesity among adults20.8%17.5–24.2
Stroke among adults2.0%1.8–2.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.1%4.1–6.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years2.8%2.4–3.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.2%70.3–75.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%78.1–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults91.2%90.0–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%67.0–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults77.8%75.5–79.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years86.7%82.7–90.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.6–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults13.1%11.2–15.1
Short sleep duration among adults30.1%26.6–33.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults9.9%8.6–11.1
Frequent mental distress among adults13.3%11.9–14.8
Frequent physical distress among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.0%8.8–11.1
Any disability among adults19.3%16.9–21.5
Hearing disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Independent living disability among adults4.5%4.1–5.1
Mobility disability among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Self-care disability among adults1.8%1.6–1.9
Vision disability among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.5–22.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Loneliness among adults31.8%28.3–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)1.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)85.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle22.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription97.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate52.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population24.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households47.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+14.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age33.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$139,747$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$1,227,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$2,623$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured