Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02126

in Mattapan, MassachusettsPopulation 26,583

47.10/ 100

Ranked #20,041 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #492 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranked #271 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 3.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

23 ppb

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

210 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

41.6%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

84.3%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST61st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

25.4%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

18.7%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

26.3%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

16.9%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

16.7%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

46.2%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mattapan, Massachusetts (ZIP 02126), overall, ranks in the bottom 38% nationally (20,041st) and the bottom 6.7% of Massachusetts (492nd).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: lead in tap water lands in the top 0.5% nationally, modeled loneliness lies in the top 2.2% nationally, and households without a vehicle stands in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 3.3% nationally, housing insecurity registers in the top 3.3% nationally, and transportation noise resides in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled transportation settles in the top 4.4% nationally, and housing-cost burden is in the top 4.8% nationally. On the better side, walkability sits in the top 2.1% nationally, and modeled mammography lands in the top 1.1% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 02124, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.2 ± 1.8 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.7 years — 3.5 years below them.

    Ranked #2,708 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.0%23.7–28.3
High blood pressure among adults40.3%37.5–43.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.5%5.0–6.0
Current asthma among adults14.0%12.7–15.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Depression among adults20.8%18.5–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.7–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%32.4–38.1
Obesity among adults33.1%29.1–37.6
Stroke among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.6%18.7–24.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.6–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%77.0–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.5%81.5–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.9–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%62.7–69.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.4%53.5–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.3%80.1–88.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.9–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%13.2–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.4%29.1–35.9
Short sleep duration among adults41.8%38.0–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.3%22.8–27.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%17.1–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.2–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.5–19.1
Any disability among adults33.4%30.3–36.5
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.5
Independent living disability among adults11.4%10.2–12.6
Mobility disability among adults18.2%16.3–20.2
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.6–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.9%7.2–8.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.7%28.5–35.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.7%26.6–33.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults36.8%33.4–40.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.3%23.6–29.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.7%15.0–18.6
Loneliness among adults41.6%37.9–45.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.7%16.7–20.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)12.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)10.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle25.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription89.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate43.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population41.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households28.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+16.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$65,709$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$542,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,637$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured