Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01756

in Mendon, MassachusettsPopulation 6,325

60.92/ 100

Ranked #4,185 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.1%)

Ranked #254 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #28 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

84.4%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST63rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$132,256

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST72nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.0%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

2.9%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

4.0%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

10.0%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.0%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Mendon, Massachusetts (ZIP 01756) stands in the top 13.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,185th) and the top 48% of Massachusetts (254th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled mammography registers in the top 1.0% nationally, and household income lies in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled food insecurity is in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and uninsured registers in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Elder services lies in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability registers in the bottom 9.0% nationally, fair or poor health lies in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and housing insecurity is in the bottom 10.4% nationally. On the other side, outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 8.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 01568, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Lifting this score

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.7–29.9
High blood pressure among adults32.0%29.0–35.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.9–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.6–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.4%4.3–6.6
Depression among adults26.1%23.3–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.8%32.9–38.9
Obesity among adults30.9%26.7–35.2
Stroke among adults2.7%2.3–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.4–10.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years2.9%2.2–3.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%72.8–78.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%79.9–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults91.5%89.8–92.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.3%67.9–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.7%71.0–76.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.4%79.6–88.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%16.7–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.3%7.7–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.6%15.2–22.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%28.8–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.5%11.1–16.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%13.8–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.2–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.0–14.2
Any disability among adults24.0%20.5–27.7
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.1
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.0–7.1
Mobility disability among adults10.0%8.2–12.0
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.1–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.8–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%5.9–10.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%6.6–12.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%5.7–9.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.3–6.6
Loneliness among adults31.6%28.1–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.2–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate86.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population7.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households54.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$132,256$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$616,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,840$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.62 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured