Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02341

in Hanson, MassachusettsPopulation 10,542

60.16/ 100

Ranked #4,745 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.8%)

Ranked #282 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #187 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

9 µg/L

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

84.3%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST61st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

76.7%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$132,250

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST72nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

7.6 ppb

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

US95th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.6%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Park land

16.9%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Hanson, Massachusetts (ZIP 02341) lands in the top 14.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,745th) and the bottom 46% of Massachusetts (282nd).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: lithium in drinking water lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and modeled mammography registers in the top 1.1% nationally. Household income sits in the top 6.6% nationally, and modeled colon screening rests in the top 3.7% nationally. Park land is in the top 8.0% nationally. Against that, PFOA in drinking water stands at the national maximum, PFOS in drinking water settles at the national maximum, and modeled pfas lies in the top 2.6% nationally. PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum, and lead in tap water lands in the top 5.4% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 02339, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.0 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $132,250 predicts 81.2 years — 3.2 years below.

    Ranked #4,377 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.0 ± 1.5 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.4 years — 2.4 years below them.

    Ranked #1,850 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.6%23.8–29.2
High blood pressure among adults30.5%27.3–33.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–10.7
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.6–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.1–7.1
Depression among adults24.6%21.4–27.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%7.8–10.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%34.3–41.0
Obesity among adults28.2%23.6–32.5
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.6%8.0–11.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.8%3.0–4.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%72.7–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%78.4–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.4–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.6%71.4–78.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.5%71.0–76.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.3%80.3–88.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.6%15.9–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.7%9.6–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.7%15.6–22.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%29.6–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.2–16.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.8–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.8–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.6–15.3
Any disability among adults27.9%24.3–31.5
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.5–7.2
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.0–12.6
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.4–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.4–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.3–11.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.1–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.4–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.9–6.7
Loneliness among adults32.8%29.0–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.5–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households55.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+19.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age42.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$132,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$536,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,821$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured