Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02919

in Johnston, Rhode IslandPopulation 29,802

55.85/ 100

Ranked #8,445 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #64 of 77 Rhode Island ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #85 of 112 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

85.1%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

61.5%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.54 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST58th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.1%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST27th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Johnston, Rhode Island (ZIP 02919) lands in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,445th) and the bottom 17% of Rhode Island (64th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled mammography settles in the top 0.6% nationally, and childcare resides in the top 9.0% nationally. Transit registers in the top 9.4% nationally, and modeled colon screening rests in the top 7.0% nationally. Mental-health providers stands in the top 10.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband lands in the top 12.6% nationally, and grocery sits in the top 13.5% nationally. On the other side, distance to a Superfund site is at the national minimum, and modeled pfas settles in the top 7.4% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 02828, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Providence-Warwick, RI-MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 9.7 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 61.7 — 52 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,582 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%24.6–29.5
High blood pressure among adults34.6%31.7–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.4–9.9
Current asthma among adults12.4%11.2–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.3–8.1
Depression among adults23.6%20.8–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.5–38.7
Obesity among adults31.8%27.2–36.7
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%9.1–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.3–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.8–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.3%81.9–86.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.3%89.0–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.1%69.7–76.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.4%68.4–74.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years85.1%81.1–88.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%14.2–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.9%10.3–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.7%23.4–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%31.4–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%15.4–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.5–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.6–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.5–15.5
Any disability among adults29.3%26.4–32.5
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.9–15.0
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%20.0–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.6–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.6–14.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%11.1–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.5–8.3
Loneliness among adults36.0%32.7–39.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (0.0–17.9%) n=77
Uninsured 18–643.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2863.7% (0.0–9.3%) n=77
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (1.2–17.4%) n=77
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.8% (20.4–68.2%) n=77
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–8.3%) n=77
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.1%) n=77
Broadband subscription93.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (87.7–100.0%) n=77
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.7% (18.9–42.2%) n=77
Homeownership rate75.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (38.8–95.1%) n=77
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.1%) n=77
Foreign-born population9.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.9% (1.6–20.3%) n=77
Single-parent households47.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.0% (35.9–70.5%) n=75
Population 65+22.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.1% (10.7–35.3%) n=77
Median age44.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.0 yr (34.6–53.3) n=76
Median household income$91,775$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$102,118 ($62,908–$137,181) n=71
Median home value$355,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$411,900 ($336,020–$633,580) n=73
Median gross rent$1,275$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,374 ($1,168–$1,781) n=59
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.5378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.8–83.6) n=72

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.53 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured