Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01462

in Lunenburg, MassachusettsPopulation 11,919

58.28/ 100

Ranked #6,174 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #333 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #41 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

86.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

18.9%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

3.8%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.7 pCi/L

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Lunenburg, Massachusetts (ZIP 01462) sits in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,174th) and the bottom 37% of Massachusetts (333rd).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled mammography stands in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled uninsured rests in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes sits in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Poverty registers in the bottom 14.9% nationally, and household income lands in the top 12.1% nationally. Home broadband subscription resides in the top 16% nationally. On the other hand, modeled arsenic lies in the top 7.0% nationally, and radon settles in the top 15% nationally. Modeled pfas stands in the top 14.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 01431, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.1 ± 3.1 years. A median household income of $112,992 predicts 80.6 years — 3.5 years above.

    Ranked #284 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.6%26.2–31.1
High blood pressure among adults33.4%30.6–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Current asthma among adults12.3%11.1–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.2–7.1
Depression among adults26.0%23.3–28.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%33.5–39.5
Obesity among adults31.4%27.4–35.7
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.2–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.8%3.0–4.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.8–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%80.0–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults91.3%90.0–92.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.0%67.5–74.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.6%70.9–75.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years86.5%82.4–89.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.8–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%9.3–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.8%17.9–24.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%29.2–36.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%13.1–17.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.6–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.3–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.3–14.7
Any disability among adults26.4%23.4–29.4
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Mobility disability among adults11.4%9.8–13.0
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%19.3–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.7–11.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.9–13.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–6.9
Loneliness among adults32.5%29.2–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription95.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate80.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population5.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households57.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$112,992$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$463,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,974$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.1 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 84.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured