Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01420

in Fitchburg, MassachusettsPopulation 41,839

48.85/ 100

Ranked #17,865 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #479 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 9.2%)

Ranked #101 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (bottom 9.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

82.9%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST35th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

97.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

262 units

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

40.5%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

16.3%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

11.2%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

10.8%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

20.2%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US80th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US77th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

17.8%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fitchburg, Massachusetts (ZIP 01420), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 44% nationally (17,865th) and the bottom 9.2% of Massachusetts (479th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled mammography settles in the top 2.5% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 9.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes sits in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Working the other way, PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 5.4% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 9.5% nationally. Lead in tap water resides in the top 10.6% nationally, and homeownership lies in the bottom 11.5% nationally. Households without a vehicle settles in the top 12.4% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 01430, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.7 ± 1.0 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.7 years — 3.0 years below them.

    Ranked #2,354 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.0%23.8–28.2
High blood pressure among adults33.2%30.5–36.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.6–7.9
Current asthma among adults12.7%11.4–14.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.7–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Depression among adults26.5%23.8–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.1%31.3–37.0
Obesity among adults35.6%31.4–40.0
Stroke among adults3.3%3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.8%12.2–17.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.6–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%70.9–75.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%77.2–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.3–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%61.5–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%60.1–65.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.9%77.9–86.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%15.3–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.9–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%25.8–32.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%32.8–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%19.7–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.7–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.9–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%16.1–19.7
Any disability among adults32.7%29.7–36.0
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.5–10.5
Mobility disability among adults14.1%12.7–15.8
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.3–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.0%24.3–29.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.2%17.9–22.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.9%20.6–25.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.3%14.5–18.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%10.0–12.4
Loneliness among adults37.0%33.8–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–642.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)13.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)7.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle11.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate54.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population12.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households40.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age36.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$72,780$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$335,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,222$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.5178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.51 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured