Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01020

in Chicopee, MassachusettsPopulation 30,167

46.48/ 100

Ranked #20,781 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #496 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 5.9%)

Ranked #28 of 38 Springfield, MA ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

80.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST18th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.9 pCi/L

in the bottom 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 34% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US66th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 01020, one of several in Chicopee, Massachusetts lands in the bottom 35% nationally (20,781st) and the bottom 5.9% of Massachusetts (496th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography resides in the top 7.1% nationally, and park land lands in the top 11.6% nationally. Walkability registers in the top 11.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Transit rests in the top 13.6% nationally. Against that, modeled transportation noise is in the top 12.1% nationally, housing-cost burden stands in the top 12.2% nationally, and modeled loneliness settles in the top 13.3% nationally. Homeownership lies in the bottom 14.5% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 01022, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%29.0–34.4
High blood pressure among adults35.7%32.6–38.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.4
Current asthma among adults13.0%11.7–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Depression among adults27.9%24.8–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.6–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%33.2–39.7
Obesity among adults34.3%29.6–39.1
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.2–16.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%6.1–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.5–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.9–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.8–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%62.6–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.7%63.7–69.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.9%75.5–85.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%13.9–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.8–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%25.8–33.0
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%32.4–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.6%20.1–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.2–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.8–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.4–19.2
Any disability among adults36.0%32.5–39.7
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.6
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Mobility disability among adults17.0%15.0–19.0
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.3%25.1–31.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.8–19.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.3%18.6–23.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.6–16.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Loneliness among adults36.8%32.8–40.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.2–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)14.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle9.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription90.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate58.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population9.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households47.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+21.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age45.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$66,009$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$280,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,212$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.57 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured