Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49112

in Edwardsburg, MichiganPopulation 10,544

47.12/ 100

Ranked #20,008 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #679 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #20 of 27 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

25.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Edwardsburg, Michigan (ZIP 49112) lands in the bottom 38% nationally (20,008th) and the bottom 30% of Michigan (679th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: recreation lies in the top 19% nationally, modeled colon screening stands in the top 27% nationally, and modeled uninsured rests in the bottom 29% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the top 31% nationally. Set against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 6.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 14.6% nationally. Fatal road crashes is in the top 18% nationally, and modeled pfas sits in the top 19% nationally. Crowded housing lands in the top 22% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 30% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. On the overall standing, ZIP 46530, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%28.9–36.1
High blood pressure among adults38.1%33.9–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.6–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.1–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
Depression among adults28.3%24.3–32.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%10.9–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%33.3–42.2
Obesity among adults37.0%29.3–45.1
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.1–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.9–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%74.6–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.0–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.2–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.1%64.2–73.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.2%62.7–69.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%69.9–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.0–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.3–20.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%22.3–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%28.5–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%18.5–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.5–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%14.0–18.1
Any disability among adults34.1%29.6–38.8
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.9
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.7–18.0
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.0–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.6–18.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.6–17.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.4–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.1–9.4
Loneliness among adults31.8%26.1–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.3–10.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)11.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate82.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households55.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+19.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$61,785$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$248,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$966$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured