Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

93653

in Raymond, CaliforniaPopulation 1,260

46.54/ 100

Ranked #20,709 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #1,256 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #28 of 65 Fresno, CA ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

51 per million

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

5.1%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.2%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

69.6 days/year

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

39.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

10.8%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.95 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

93.8%

in the top 10.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Raymond, California (ZIP 93653) ranks in the bottom 35% nationally (20,709th) and the bottom 27% of California (1,256th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 0.6% nationally, and fine-particle lies in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands in the top 6.0% nationally, and walkability sits in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Fatal road crashes is in the top 7.0% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 8.2% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled pfas resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, modeled transportation noise registers at the national minimum, and recreation rests in the top 9.8% nationally. Homeownership stands in the top 10.4% nationally.

To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Close by, ZIP 93601, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Fresno, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.2%28.5–35.9
High blood pressure among adults39.5%35.3–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.7–11.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.8–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.6–10.8
Depression among adults23.6%20.3–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.7–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.7–44.0
Obesity among adults33.3%26.9–40.3
Stroke among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.4–11.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.4–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%73.7–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.8%72.4–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.6–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%63.0–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.5%62.0–68.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%64.1–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%11.9–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%11.7–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%20.2–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%28.0–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.5%20.9–28.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%15.8–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.3–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.4–18.0
Any disability among adults35.9%31.0–40.8
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.6–11.7
Mobility disability among adults19.0%16.2–22.1
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.4–6.0
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.8–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.3–17.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.6%12.8–18.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.9–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–10.0
Loneliness among adults32.8%28.2–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–643.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)11.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)10.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription96.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate93.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households57.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+25.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age52.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$120,568$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$533,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,382$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.4778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.47 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured