Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

How the El Paso, TX metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the El Paso, TX metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 202632 of 33 ZIP codes scored · 0.87M residents represented

Open the full ranking →Download the data (CSV)How the Score works

Score snapshot

48.14Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
44.74Median scoremiddle of 32 scored ZIPs
62.06Highest score79911 · El Paso
22.51Lowest score79901 · El Paso
39.54Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#261Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
71%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.62M of 0.87M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.87MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0.87MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0ZIPs in the national top 100—

The El Paso, TX metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 32 of 32
  1. 3,49179911in El Paso · 10,192 residents62.06
  2. 5,00579922in El Paso · 6,800 residents59.80
  3. 5,92279912in El Paso · 78,819 residents58.58
  4. 7,24479934in El Paso · 28,861 residents57.02
  5. 8,09679932in El Paso · 30,786 residents56.17
  6. 10,10179938in El Paso · 99,621 residents54.48
  7. 14,54779936in El Paso · 102,991 residents51.20
  8. 14,56179916in Fort Bliss · 3,055 residents51.19
  9. 15,01779928in Horizon City · 86,599 residents50.89
  10. 16,29479925in El Paso · 38,621 residents49.97
  11. 17,24879902in El Paso · 19,031 residents49.29
  12. 17,88879935in El Paso · 18,720 residents48.83
  13. 19,50579924in El Paso · 60,364 residents47.54
  14. 19,50679908in El Paso · 4,148 residents47.54
  15. 20,57479835in Canutillo · 11,440 residents46.65
  16. 21,65079821in Anthony · 7,227 residents45.70
  17. 23,63079906in El Paso · 5,917 residents43.78
  18. 24,31979927in Socorro · 44,444 residents43.06
  19. 26,81379903in El Paso · 14,715 residents39.93
  20. 26,89579838in Fabens · 4,969 residents39.79
  21. 27,13479836in Clint · 7,711 residents39.41
  22. 27,28079907in El Paso · 46,365 residents39.17
  23. 27,63879930in El Paso · 24,123 residents38.65
  24. 27,90279904in El Paso · 32,976 residents38.19
  25. 28,00979849in San Elizario · 14,409 residents38.01
  26. 28,53379853in Tornillo · 2,686 residents36.98
  27. 28,96879839in Fort Hancock · 1,416 residents36.06
  28. 28,99579915in El Paso · 34,230 residents36.00
  29. 29,26279851in Sierra Blanca · 1,198 residents35.33
  30. 30,77879847in Salt Flat · 201 residents29.92
  31. 31,23479905in El Paso · 22,594 residents27.07
  32. 31,70879901in El Paso · 8,554 residents22.51
Open the full El Paso, TX metro ranking →One page, all 32 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

What the distribution shows

Across the El Paso, TX metro’s 33 ZIP codes, the ZipVitals Score spans a wide range. 32 of them carry enough measured coverage across all nine health domains to enter the population-weighted composite above; the rest are held out rather than filled from a coarser geography.

The El Paso, TX metro has no in-metro comparison group: too few of its ZIP codes carry measured data across all nine scoring domains for the others to be placed against them, so the domain-by-domain breakdown that other metro pages carry is not available here. Every one of its ZIP codes still carries its own Score and its national standing.

Assembled from the same ZIP-level data as every per-ZIP page. Read the full method →

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The El Paso, TX figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.