Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

79838

in Fabens, TexasPopulation 4,969

39.79/ 100

Ranked #26,895 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #1,472 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #20 of 32 El Paso, TX ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

37.5%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.9%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

49.3%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.6%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.7%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

75.4%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

28.5%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.0%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

63.5 days/year

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fabens, Texas (ZIP 79838), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 16% nationally (26,895th) and the bottom 21% of Texas (1,472nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled uninsured stands in the top 0.4% nationally, and vision disability registers in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and fair or poor health sits in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the top 4.2% nationally, pfas rests in the top 3.0% nationally, and arsenic resides in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled self-care disability is in the top 5.9% nationally, tree cover lands at the national minimum, and extreme heat stands in the top 6.8% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 79927, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.0%20.5–25.5
High blood pressure among adults36.8%33.5–40.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Current asthma among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Depression among adults19.9%17.1–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.7%17.4–21.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%34.0–40.8
Obesity among adults35.9%31.1–40.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.9%16.8–23.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years37.5%33.0–42.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.7–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.8–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.7%80.3–84.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years49.3%44.9–53.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults42.3%39.3–45.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.2%63.5–76.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.5–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%12.0–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.1%36.7–45.6
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%34.7–43.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.6%31.0–38.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%16.0–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults18.4%16.3–20.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.7%17.3–22.1
Any disability among adults40.2%36.0–44.3
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Independent living disability among adults11.3%10.0–12.8
Mobility disability among adults21.4%18.9–24.0
Self-care disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.9
Vision disability among adults11.9%10.7–13.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6436.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)38.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription86.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate72.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population36.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households49.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+21.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age46.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$43,367$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$95,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$606$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.1 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 74.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured