Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

79821

in Anthony, TexasPopulation 7,227

45.70/ 100

Ranked #21,650 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #889 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #16 of 32 El Paso, TX ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

32.5%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

52.2%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

96 µg/L

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.3%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

23.1%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.8%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.4%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

53.6 days/year

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Anthony, Texas (ZIP 79821) ranks in the bottom 32% nationally (21,650th) and the top 48% of Texas (889th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled uninsured rests in the top 0.7% nationally, and colon screening is in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Lithium in drinking water stands in the top 2.7% nationally, and modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum. Modeled vision disability lies in the top 6.6% nationally, modeled arsenic resides in the top 5.1% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the top 9.6% nationally, and extreme heat sits in the top 8.3% nationally. Better still, grocery rests in the top 11.0% nationally.

In plainer terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 79835, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.3 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $59,232 predicts 78.0 years — 1.8 years below.

    Ranked #2,203 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.3 ± 1.5 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.4 years — 3.1 years below them.

    Ranked #2,453 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.1%17.8–22.5
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.9–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Current asthma among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.6–6.2
Depression among adults19.6%16.9–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.3%14.4–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.4%31.1–37.8
Obesity among adults35.6%30.9–40.5
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%14.0–20.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years32.5%28.3–37.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%70.4–76.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%69.7–76.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.5%80.2–84.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years52.2%48.0–56.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.8%43.6–50.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%64.0–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%15.0–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%12.1–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.5%30.9–40.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%35.0–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.4%25.8–33.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.7–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.1–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.9%15.5–20.3
Any disability among adults35.3%31.1–39.6
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.1
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.2–10.8
Mobility disability among adults16.9%14.6–19.3
Self-care disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.4
Vision disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6434.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)25.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription93.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate78.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population27.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households40.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+12.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$59,232$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$153,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,053$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured