ZIP code
99762
in Nome, AlaskaPopulation 4,156
47.86/ 100
Ranked #19,099 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)
Ranked #60 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 28%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
407.1 mi
in the top 0.07% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
449.2 mi
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
7.9 per million
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
454.5 mi
in the top 0.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST83rdUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Energy-cost burden
7.2%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST38thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.21 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST30thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
15.3%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST62ndUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Households without a vehicle
25.6%
in the top 3.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST45thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with no vehicle available.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
20.9%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Mammography
66.2%
in the bottom 4.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST80thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›The read
Nome, Alaska (ZIP 99762) ranks in the bottom 40% nationally (19,099th) and the top 28% of Alaska (60th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: distance to an emergency room lands in the top 0.2% nationally, and modeled energy burden settles in the top 1.1% nationally. Walkability rests in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 2.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle settles in the top 3.1% nationally, modeled binge drinking rests in the top 3.5% nationally, and modeled mammography lands in the bottom 4.2% nationally. On the brighter side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 0.07% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 0.2% nationally.
Against its neighbors, crowded housing runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 99503, about 226 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 83%
22%
Environmental HazardPartial
in the top 0.00%
14%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 60%
9%
Disability
healthier than 53%
8%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 2%
17%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 8%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
6%
No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
99739
Alaskashares a border
Score 23.86
Closest healthier
99503
Alaskaabout 226 mi away
Score 48.26
Similar health profile
99653
Alaska95% similar profile
Score 42.11
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 19.9% | 17.4–22.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 28.7% | 25.3–32.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 5.6% | 5.1–6.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.8% | 10.5–13.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.4% | 4.8–6.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.1% | 5.3–7.0 |
| Depression among adults | 19.9% | 16.9–23.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.3% | 8.1–10.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 30.6% | 27.0–34.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 33.5% | 27.6–40.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.2% | 2.9–3.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 16.5% | 13.6–20.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.2% | 8.3–12.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 65.1% | 61.5–68.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 63.8% | 59.2–68.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 76.9% | 74.0–79.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 58.4% | 53.2–63.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 55.4% | 51.7–59.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 66.2% | 57.1–74.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 20.9% | 17.5–24.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 20.6% | 17.6–24.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 21.8% | 18.3–25.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.8% | 33.8–46.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.8% | 17.2–22.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.0% | 15.9–20.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.7% | 12.1–15.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.2% | 14.2–18.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 31.0% | 27.0–35.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.8% | 6.9–8.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.7% | 7.6–9.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.8% | 10.2–13.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.6% | 3.2–4.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.7% | 5.1–6.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 29.2% | 25.2–33.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.5% | 16.4–22.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 12.7% | 10.4–15.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.9% | 13.5–18.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.3% | 10.7–14.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.6% | 29.7–39.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 10.9% | 9.3–12.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 8.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 16.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 20.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 5.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 21.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 15.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 9.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 8.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226 |
| Households without a vehicle | 25.6% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 31.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228 |
| Broadband subscription | 93.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 17.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228 |
| Homeownership rate | 57.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 71.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 15.3% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 8.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228 |
| Foreign-born population | 4.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231 |
| Single-parent households | 38.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 44.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221 |
| Population 65+ | 8.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 12.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231 |
| Median age | 31.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 35.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226 |
| Median household income | $113,558 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197 |
| Median home value | $353,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178 |
| Median gross rent | $1,634 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.1 yr ± 1.12 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured