Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99739

in Elim, AlaskaPopulation 383

23.86/ 100

Ranked #31,575 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.6%)

Ranked #159 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

11.7%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

40.3%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

58.6%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST36th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

45.8%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST17th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

390.8 mi

in the top 0.09% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

410.3 mi

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

8 per million

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.0%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

414.2 mi

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

85.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Households with no vehicle
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Elim, Alaska (ZIP 99739) ranks in the bottom 1.6% nationally (31,575th) and the bottom 25% of Alaska (159th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Plainly, the numbers point to a handful of defining readings: modeled energy burden settles in the top 0.3% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled mammography lands in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and colon screening settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests in the top 0.2% nationally, modeled vision disability lands in the top 2.1% nationally, and households without a vehicle settles in the top 0.3% nationally. On the brighter side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 0.09% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 0.3% nationally.

For context, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 99762, just across the boundary. The area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.00%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.01%

17%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.08%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

9%

Disability

healthier than 2%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.2%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.1%19.5–24.9
High blood pressure among adults34.7%30.8–38.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Current asthma among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%8.7–12.1
Depression among adults22.0%18.8–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.2–16.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.7%27.0–34.6
Obesity among adults42.6%35.8–49.5
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years40.3%34.6–46.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.6%13.0–20.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure63.2%59.6–66.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults61.7%57.1–66.3
Cholesterol screening among adults66.8%63.1–71.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years45.8%40.5–51.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults37.8%34.2–41.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years58.6%48.4–67.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%15.4–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults36.8%31.4–42.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.3%28.4–40.1
Short sleep duration among adults44.5%38.3–51.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.4%29.5–39.3
Frequent mental distress among adults23.6%20.7–26.6
Frequent physical distress among adults20.2%17.4–22.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults24.8%21.3–28.3
Any disability among adults45.2%39.3–50.9
Hearing disability among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Independent living disability among adults15.9%13.5–18.3
Mobility disability among adults19.4%16.5–22.3
Self-care disability among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Vision disability among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.6%29.7–39.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults44.4%37.7–51.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults37.6%31.2–43.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.0%26.4–35.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults26.4%22.7–30.5
Loneliness among adults38.0%32.7–43.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults24.7%21.4–28.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate41.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6425.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)38.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle85.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription89.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate73.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)40.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households18.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+5.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age22.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$37,031$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$120,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,125$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.7 yr ± 2.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.65 years of 84.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured