ZIP code
99756
in Manley Hot Springs, AlaskaPopulation 32
39.98/ 100
Ranked #26,766 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)
Ranked #97 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 46%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Energy-cost burden
8.2%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST44thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.019 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST6thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
45.6 mi
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST39thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
45.5 mi
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST33rdUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
45.8 mi
in the top 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST43rdUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
10 per million
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST74thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Mammography
67%
in the bottom 5.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST83rdUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›The read
Manley Hot Springs, Alaska (ZIP 99756), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 17% nationally (26,766th) and the top 46% of Alaska (97th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled energy burden registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits in the top 0.8% nationally, and distance to an emergency room lies in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled mammography rests in the bottom 5.5% nationally. On the stronger side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 0.9% nationally, housing-cost burden is at the national minimum, and modeled transportation noise lands at the national minimum. Poverty stands at the national minimum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally.
For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 99760, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental HazardPartial
in the top 0.00%
14%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 44%
9%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 32%
22%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 2%
17%
Preventive Care
healthier than 6%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 27%
11%
Disability
healthier than 18%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
6%
No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
99760
Alaskashares a border
Score 44.51
Closest healthier
99709
Alaskaabout 18 mi away
Score 55.10
Similar health profile
99665
Alaska98% similar profile
Score 24.85
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.4% | 26.0–33.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 38.4% | 34.3–42.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.8% | 7.0–8.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.8% | 11.3–14.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.1% | 7.2–9.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.5% | 8.0–11.0 |
| Depression among adults | 21.3% | 18.1–25.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.7% | 11.9–15.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.2% | 33.9–42.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.4% | 27.6–42.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.6% | 4.1–5.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 17.6% | 14.6–21.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.2% | 8.1–12.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 72.8% | 69.2–76.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 70.7% | 66.4–74.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 79.3% | 76.4–82.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 58.8% | 53.2–64.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 52.1% | 48.1–56.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 67.0% | 57.9–75.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.7% | 12.1–17.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 23.3% | 19.7–26.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.8% | 21.4–30.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.3% | 29.9–43.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 25.6% | 22.1–29.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.7% | 16.5–21.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.8% | 15.6–20.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.5% | 15.1–20.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 37.8% | 33.1–43.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.6% | 9.4–11.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.2% | 9.7–12.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 17.6% | 15.1–20.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.1% | 4.4–5.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.5% | 6.5–8.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.1% | 24.2–32.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 23.6% | 19.8–27.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 16.9% | 13.8–20.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.4% | 14.8–20.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 14.2% | 12.2–16.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.9% | 31.0–41.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.2% | 10.4–14.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 20.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 25.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 6.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 15.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 8.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 31.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228 |
| Broadband subscription | 90.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 17.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228 |
| Homeownership rate | 90.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 71.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 8.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 44.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221 |
| Population 65+ | 100.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 12.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231 |
| Median age | 75.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 35.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226 |
| Median household income | $58,125 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197 |
| Median home value | $110,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.7 yr ± 0.81 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured