ZIP code
99776
in Tanacross, AlaskaPopulation 155
29.70/ 100
Ranked #30,829 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)
Ranked #129 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (bottom 39%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
60.4%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST46thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
160.5 mi
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
8.1 per million
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST30thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
147.1 mi
in the top 0.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST65thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
160.6 mi
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST52ndUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.35 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST35thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
13.1%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Households without a vehicle
44%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST57thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with no vehicle available.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
50%
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST10thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
10.2%
in the top 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST63rdUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Cross-source signals
Health need and barriers to care documented here
On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.
These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.
Health need documented here
- People living in poverty
- Food insecurity
- Housing insecurity
- Adults reporting fair or poor health
Barriers to reaching care
- Distance to the nearest emergency room
- Households with no vehicle
- Limited home internet for telehealth
A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.
See the full care-deserts analysis →The read
On the composite measure, Tanacross, Alaska (ZIP 99776) stands in the bottom 3.9% nationally (30,829th) and the bottom 39% of Alaska (129th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
On the ground here, a handful of readings tell most of the story: modeled mammography is in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and distance to a nursing home registers in the top 0.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies in the top 0.4% nationally, and walkability is in the bottom 0.8% nationally. Modeled hearing disability registers in the top 1.8% nationally, households without a vehicle lies in the top 1.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Modeled vision disability registers in the top 4.5% nationally. More positively, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 0.3% nationally.
Set beside the wider area around it, distance to a nursing home runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 99737, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby. Beyond the headline readings, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental HazardPartial
in the top 0.00%
14%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 47%
9%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 17%
22%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.4%
17%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 2%
11%
Disability
healthier than 4%
8%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.2%
6%
No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
99737
Alaskashares a border
Score 50.95
Closest healthier
99780
Alaskashares a border
Score 36.80
Similar health profile
99580
Alaska100% similar profile
Score 25.87
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.8% | 26.4–33.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.7% | 37.7–45.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.9% | 6.0–7.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.3% | 11.6–15.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.2% | 7.8–10.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.2% | 8.3–12.4 |
| Depression among adults | 19.8% | 16.7–23.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.6% | 14.1–19.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 33.5% | 29.7–37.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 42.1% | 35.7–48.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.6% | 4.8–6.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 23.4% | 19.2–28.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.7% | 9.8–16.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 71.1% | 67.7–74.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 68.0% | 63.9–72.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 76.8% | 73.9–79.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 53.9% | 48.7–59.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 45.6% | 41.6–49.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 60.4% | 51.7–68.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.2% | 12.6–18.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 28.5% | 23.2–33.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 33.5% | 27.6–39.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 41.4% | 35.7–47.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 31.6% | 26.6–36.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.5% | 16.8–21.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 20.5% | 17.7–23.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.4% | 16.3–22.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.8% | 38.0–49.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 13.1% | 11.3–14.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.3% | 11.1–15.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.0% | 18.4–25.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.1–7.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 10.2% | 8.6–12.0 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 32.3% | 27.9–37.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 30.8% | 25.1–36.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 23.5% | 18.6–28.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 21.8% | 18.2–25.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 18.7% | 15.7–21.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 37.8% | 32.9–43.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 16.5% | 13.9–19.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 40.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 47.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 20.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 36.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 3.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 15.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 16.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 8.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226 |
| Households without a vehicle | 44.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 31.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228 |
| Broadband subscription | 50.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 6.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 17.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228 |
| Homeownership rate | 36.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 71.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 6.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 8.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231 |
| Single-parent households | 31.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 44.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221 |
| Population 65+ | 5.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 12.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231 |
| Median age | 32.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 35.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226 |
| Median household income | $53,125 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197 |
| Median home value | $85,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178 |
| Median gross rent | $528 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.7 yr ± 0.95 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured