Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99720

in Allakaket, AlaskaPopulation 178

29.85/ 100

Ranked #30,798 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.0%)

Ranked #127 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

10.6%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

179.7 mi

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

14.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

180.8 mi

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST72nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

9 per million

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

179.5 mi

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

76.9%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

62.4%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST54th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

65.7%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

182.9 mi

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST47th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Households with no vehicle
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Allakaket, Alaska (ZIP 99720) sits in the bottom 4.0% nationally (30,798th) and the bottom 40% of Alaska (127th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Here the data is straightforward about what defines the area: modeled energy burden resides in the top 0.4% nationally, distance to a nursing home sits in the top 0.2% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the top 0.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides in the top 0.4% nationally, households without a vehicle sits in the top 0.4% nationally, and modeled mammography stands in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Poverty resides in the top 0.8% nationally. Better still, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 1.2% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, distance to a nursing home runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 99768, about 12 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.00%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

9%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.02%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.10%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%26.3–33.4
High blood pressure among adults42.7%38.3–47.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.6–8.2
Current asthma among adults12.7%11.2–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.6–12.0
Depression among adults19.0%15.9–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.6%15.2–20.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%33.8–42.5
Obesity among adults37.8%30.5–45.7
Stroke among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.4%24.7–34.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.9%9.6–16.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.1%68.8–75.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.6%65.2–73.9
Cholesterol screening among adults77.7%74.6–80.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.0%53.2–64.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.2%42.2–50.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years62.4%52.6–71.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.2–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults28.3%23.5–33.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.2%23.9–35.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.9%33.1–47.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.9%26.5–35.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.4–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults19.9%17.2–22.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.6%15.9–21.5
Any disability among adults43.0%37.5–48.8
Hearing disability among adults14.4%12.8–16.2
Independent living disability among adults12.8%11.0–14.8
Mobility disability among adults21.3%18.1–24.8
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Vision disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.4%26.9–36.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.0%25.3–36.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.6%17.9–27.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.4%18.4–26.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults18.5%15.7–21.5
Loneliness among adults35.9%30.7–41.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.5%13.7–19.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate65.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6426.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)23.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)14.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle76.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription51.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate48.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)17.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households17.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+6.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age26.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.1 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured