Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99321

in Beverly, WashingtonPopulation 1,047

47.27/ 100

Ranked #19,829 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #480 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

30.6%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

78%

in the top 0.04% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

51.9%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

26.8 mi

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

20.3 mi

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

42.2%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.3%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Beverly, Washington (ZIP 99321), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 38% nationally (19,829th) and the bottom 17% of Washington (480th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled uninsured stands in the top 1.0% nationally, crowded housing resides in the top 0.04% nationally, and modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands in the top 2.0% nationally, modeled tree cover resides at the national minimum, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 5.3% nationally. Homeownership stands in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 6.0% nationally. Better still, home broadband subscription sits at the national maximum, and modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 4.6% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 98848, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 1.0%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.0%17.1–21.2
High blood pressure among adults28.8%26.0–31.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Depression among adults20.6%18.0–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.8–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.0%28.0–34.5
Obesity among adults42.3%37.4–47.9
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.8–16.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years30.6%26.1–35.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure63.8%60.5–67.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults64.6%60.7–68.7
Cholesterol screening among adults75.3%72.5–78.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years51.9%47.6–56.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.6%48.5–54.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.5%63.0–76.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.5–21.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%10.7–14.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.4%27.3–35.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%30.3–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.0%25.4–32.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.8–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.0–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%17.6–22.8
Any disability among adults36.1%31.9–40.6
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Mobility disability among adults14.4%12.5–16.4
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Vision disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6457.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)40.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)4.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate42.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)78.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population32.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households22.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+2.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age22.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$75,795$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,102$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.6 yr ± 2.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.74 years of 86.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured