Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99153

in Metaline Falls, WashingtonPopulation 467

51.76/ 100

Ranked #13,756 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #354 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

83.6%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

90.9%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

32.8 mi

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

26.6 mi

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

26.7 mi

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.9%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

13.2%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Metaline Falls, Washington (ZIP 99153) comes out in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,756th) and the bottom 39% of Washington (354th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: park land lands in the top 0.6% nationally, modeled tree cover is in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 4.9% nationally. By contrast, distance to a nursing home sits in the top 2.0% nationally, and distance to an emergency room settles in the top 2.6% nationally. Walkability registers in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and modeled fine-particle stands in the top 4.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands in the top 9.2% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 99152, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.5%32.0–39.4
High blood pressure among adults39.2%35.2–43.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.2–13.6
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%7.1–9.7
Depression among adults23.4%20.2–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.3–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.3%37.0–45.6
Obesity among adults37.4%31.1–44.2
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.9%9.8–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.2–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%73.9–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.2%70.5–77.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.6–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.1%67.7–76.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%59.6–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.9%64.7–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%12.0–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%10.2–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.2%17.5–25.5
Short sleep duration among adults30.8%25.9–36.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%16.8–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.7–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.1–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.0–15.7
Any disability among adults33.6%29.5–38.3
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.9–9.1
Mobility disability among adults16.1%13.9–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)3.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)8.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle13.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription76.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate62.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population5.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households66.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+29.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age56.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$44,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$282,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$712$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.3 yr ± 3.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.93 years of 85.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured