Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83848

in Nordman, IdahoPopulation 315

52.17/ 100

Ranked #13,219 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #112 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

24.9%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Park land

81.8%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

13.6%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

64.3%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST14th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

41.1%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

26.2%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

24 mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

Nordman, Idaho (ZIP 83848), overall, ranks in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,219th) and the top 42% of Idaho (112th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 0.4% nationally, park land registers in the top 0.6% nationally, and modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Housing-cost burden settles at the national minimum, modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and poverty sits at the national minimum. On the other side, modeled hearing disability lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and mammography lies in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands in the top 1.5% nationally, and distance to a nursing home rests in the top 2.4% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 83864, about 3.7 miles away, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.1%31.9–40.1
High blood pressure among adults41.8%37.2–46.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.2%11.8–14.6
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%8.7–11.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%7.3–11.8
Depression among adults19.7%16.7–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.4–16.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%36.8–45.7
Obesity among adults31.8%25.9–38.2
Stroke among adults5.0%4.2–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.7%13.8–19.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%5.3–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%75.7–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.6–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.2–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%59.5–69.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.9%65.7–72.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.3%55.6–72.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%9.8–14.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%9.2–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%18.7–29.3
Short sleep duration among adults26.2%21.7–31.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%15.7–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults12.9%11.1–15.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%12.9–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.1–16.3
Any disability among adults37.4%31.9–43.5
Hearing disability among adults13.6%11.7–15.5
Independent living disability among adults8.4%6.7–10.2
Mobility disability among adults19.4%15.6–23.5
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.6–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.3–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.1%14.9–21.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.2–12.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.1–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.6–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.7–7.1
Loneliness among adults24.9%20.8–29.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.1–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6424.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)25.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle41.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate92.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+30.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age59.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$127,313$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$824,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 3.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.91 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured