Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99140

in Keller, WashingtonPopulation 486

36.61/ 100

Ranked #28,707 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.5%)

Ranked #577 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 0.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

62.4%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

4.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

18.5%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.5%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.1%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST18th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.3%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Keller, Washington (ZIP 99140) sits in the bottom 10.5% nationally (28,707th) and the bottom 0.7% of Washington (577th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled mammography stands in the bottom 1.3% nationally, modeled fine-particle resides in the top 1.3% nationally, and households without a vehicle sits in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the top 6.0% nationally, slow internet speeds resides in the top 7.9% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Walkability stands in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the better side, modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum.

Put plainly, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 99116, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 1.0%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%30.0–36.9
High blood pressure among adults38.2%34.0–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Current asthma among adults14.1%12.4–15.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.5–10.0
Depression among adults24.7%21.1–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.0%13.9–18.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%32.3–40.5
Obesity among adults42.3%34.7–49.7
Stroke among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.6%17.2–24.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%7.7–11.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.6%70.3–76.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.9%66.8–74.8
Cholesterol screening among adults82.1%79.7–84.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.8%56.7–66.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.9%48.2–55.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years62.4%54.1–70.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.0–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.0%17.0–23.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.3%21.8–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%33.3–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.5%24.0–31.2
Frequent mental distress among adults20.1%17.7–22.5
Frequent physical distress among adults19.1%16.8–21.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.0%16.7–21.6
Any disability among adults41.8%36.9–46.6
Hearing disability among adults11.6%10.3–12.8
Independent living disability among adults11.7%10.2–13.3
Mobility disability among adults20.0%17.4–22.8
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.3
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)11.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)7.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle18.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription74.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate79.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population1.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households62.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+28.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age51.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$53,529$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$140,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$450$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 2.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.38 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured