Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

98830

in Mansfield, WashingtonPopulation 557

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

40.91/ 100

Ranked #26,105 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #563 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 3.1%)

Ranked #22 of 22 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA ZIPs (bottom 4.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

64.8%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.85 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

29.9%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.4%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.2%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Mansfield, Washington (ZIP 98830) ranks in the bottom 19% nationally (26,105th) and the bottom 3.1% of Washington (563rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled mammography lands in the bottom 2.7% nationally, and walkability registers in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Modeled arsenic sits in the top 3.3% nationally, and fine-particle rests in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled hearing disability is in the top 6.0% nationally, stroke stands in the top 6.9% nationally, and coronary heart disease settles in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lies in the top 8.4% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and civic lands in the top 1.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, civic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 98813, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.3%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.8%31.3–38.4
High blood pressure among adults42.2%38.2–46.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.7–11.8
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.6–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%9.6–13.3
Depression among adults25.1%21.6–28.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%13.5–17.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%35.4–43.7
Obesity among adults39.5%33.1–46.2
Stroke among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.2%20.7–28.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%10.3–15.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.6–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%70.8–77.7
Cholesterol screening among adults83.3%81.0–85.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%60.4–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.3%51.0–57.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.8%56.9–72.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%10.9–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%14.7–21.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.4%24.7–34.6
Short sleep duration among adults29.6%25.1–34.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.6%24.6–32.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%15.9–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults19.6%17.2–22.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.3–21.4
Any disability among adults43.1%38.0–48.2
Hearing disability among adults11.6%10.2–13.1
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.3–13.7
Mobility disability among adults22.2%19.0–25.5
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.5–7.5
Vision disability among adults7.9%6.8–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)38.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle8.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription81.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate75.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households71.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+28.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age42.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$83,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$262,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$575$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.2 yr ± 1.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.45 years of 83.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured