Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98816

in Chelan, WashingtonPopulation 7,752

53.80/ 100

Ranked #10,952 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #283 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #14 of 22 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

74.4%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

8.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

0.95%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

23.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.7%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.8 per million

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Chelan, Washington (ZIP 98816) sits in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,952nd) and the top 49% of Washington (283rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: park land resides in the top 0.9% nationally, transit lies in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled energy burden settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers rests in the top 7.2% nationally. Working the other way, modeled disaster risk sits in the top 4.5% nationally, and arsenic registers in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled fine-particle lands in the top 5.2% nationally, and walkability resides in the bottom 6.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. ZIP 98814, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.7 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $82,577 predicts 79.3 years — 1.4 years above.

    Ranked #1,329 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%28.1–33.9
High blood pressure among adults36.2%32.8–39.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Depression among adults24.6%21.6–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.2–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.8–42.1
Obesity among adults30.3%25.4–35.5
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.2%10.0–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.6%10.9–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.6%72.5–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.8%69.4–76.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%83.1–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.8%64.5–72.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.5%61.3–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.2%60.6–74.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.9–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%11.2–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%20.0–26.7
Short sleep duration among adults28.0%23.8–32.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%19.5–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%14.1–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%14.0–17.3
Any disability among adults33.8%30.4–37.5
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Independent living disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Mobility disability among adults15.9%14.1–17.9
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6430.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)18.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate65.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population20.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households65.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+27.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age48.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$82,577$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$499,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,278$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured