Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98367

in Port Orchard, WashingtonPopulation 31,756

57.15/ 100

Ranked #7,129 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #177 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #12 of 18 Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

84.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.5%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 98367, one of several in Port Orchard, Washington lands in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,129th) and the top 30% of Washington (177th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: home broadband subscription lies in the top 8.8% nationally, modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 11.7% nationally, and modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Household income registers in the top 11.2% nationally, modeled tooth loss resides in the bottom 10.1% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health settles in the bottom 14.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas is in the top 1.2% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 8.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 12.0% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. On the overall standing, ZIP 98332, less than a tenth of a mile away, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%26.1–30.7
High blood pressure among adults34.0%31.3–36.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.9–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.5–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Depression among adults26.0%23.4–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%32.2–37.8
Obesity among adults32.8%29.0–36.7
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%6.0–8.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.5–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.0%70.1–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.5%69.6–75.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.3%83.8–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.3%65.8–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.1%66.4–71.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%66.9–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%15.0–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%9.8–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.6%14.4–18.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%29.6–36.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.1%13.4–16.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.9–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.7–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%12.1–14.8
Any disability among adults26.6%24.0–29.3
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–646.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription97.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate85.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households59.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age43.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$115,482$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$565,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,855$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured