Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98340

in Hansville, WashingtonPopulation 2,721

58.38/ 100

Ranked #6,087 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #148 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #9 of 18 Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

77.2%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

75.2%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

38.8%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

5.1%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.09%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

10.7%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

13.2%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Hansville, Washington (ZIP 98340) lands in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,087th) and the top 25% of Washington (148th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: fatal road crashes rests at the national minimum, and modeled colon screening stands in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and tooth loss lands in the bottom 2.4% nationally. Modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 8.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden settles in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Set against that, modeled pfas resides in the top 3.0% nationally, floodplain exposure registers in the top 6.6% nationally, and unemployment rests in the top 8.4% nationally.

A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 98346, just across the boundary, ranks better overall. The ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.2%33.3–39.3
High blood pressure among adults41.4%38.3–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.4%13.1–15.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%10.0–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.0–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.4–8.3
Depression among adults23.5%20.9–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.5–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%38.3–44.6
Obesity among adults31.0%27.2–35.0
Stroke among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.1%4.1–6.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%3.9–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.6–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%76.3–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%89.3–91.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years77.2%74.0–80.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.7%72.2–76.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%66.9–77.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%11.4–15.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.1%7.1–11.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.8%13.8–20.4
Short sleep duration among adults28.4%25.1–31.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%12.6–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults13.1%11.5–15.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%11.7–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.4–12.9
Any disability among adults28.3%24.5–32.5
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.2
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.3–7.8
Mobility disability among adults14.0%11.5–17.0
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.7–4.0
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.3–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–649.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)10.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle9.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription86.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate85.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population9.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households88.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+53.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age66.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$79,876$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$569,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$2,379$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 1.2978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.29 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured