ZIP code
98065
in Snoqualmie, WashingtonPopulation 15,944
70.41/ 100
Ranked #516 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.7%)
Ranked #21 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 3.7%)
Ranked #21 of 166 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA ZIPs (top 12.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Median household income
$198,216
in the top 1.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Obesity
22.5%
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
5.5%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
3.0%
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
5.5%
in the bottom 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
23.2%
in the bottom 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
3.6%
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Stroke
1.8%
in the bottom 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
9.6%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
4.2%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Snoqualmie, Washington (ZIP 98065) ranks in the top 1.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (516th) and the top 3.7% of Washington (21st).
A number of measures pull each way for this area: household income settles in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled obesity resides in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the bottom 1.4% nationally, high blood pressure lies in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and hearing disability lands in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the bottom 1.7% nationally, fair or poor health is in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the bottom 0.5% nationally.
Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Close by, ZIP 98050, about 0.9 miles away, ranks healthier overall. On other measures, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 98%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 96%
11%
Disability
in the top 0.4%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 91%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 55%
8%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 36%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 25%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 93%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 95%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 89%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 61%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 83%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 76%
8%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 61%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 22%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 85%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 88%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 99%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 63%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 73%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 69%
8%
Disability
healthier than 93%
7%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 50%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 8%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
98014
Washingtonshares a border
Score 64.91
Closest healthier
98050
Washingtonabout 0.9 mi away
Score 73.10
Similar health profile
80109
Colorado99% similar profile
Score 65.49
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 18.1% | 16.9–19.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 23.2% | 21.8–24.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.6% | 6.1–7.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.1% | 9.3–11.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.0% | 2.7–3.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 2.8% | 2.5–3.1 |
| Depression among adults | 25.5% | 23.7–27.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 5.5% | 5.0–6.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 32.2% | 30.5–34.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 22.5% | 20.4–24.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.8% | 1.6–1.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 4.3% | 3.6–5.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.6% | 3.9–5.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 63.5% | 61.0–66.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 69.6% | 67.6–71.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.1% | 86.9–89.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.2% | 60.8–65.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 76.5% | 74.9–78.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.1% | 74.8–81.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 20.0% | 18.4–21.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 6.6% | 5.7–7.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–11.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 28.4% | 26.3–30.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 9.6% | 8.7–10.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.5% | 13.4–15.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 8.7% | 8.0–9.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 9.7% | 8.8–10.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 17.0% | 15.6–18.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 3.6% | 3.3–3.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 4.2% | 3.7–4.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 5.5% | 4.9–6.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.8% | 1.7–2.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.3% | 2.1–2.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 1.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 1.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 8.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 1.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 67.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 27.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580 |
| Broadband subscription | 99.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 92.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 23.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 28.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580 |
| Homeownership rate | 85.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 75.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.9% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580 |
| Foreign-born population | 13.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 6.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588 |
| Single-parent households | 38.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574 |
| Population 65+ | 8.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588 |
| Median age | 39.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584 |
| Median household income | $198,216 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547 |
| Median home value | $956,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542 |
| Median gross rent | $2,864 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 82.0 yr ± 1.25 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 82.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured