Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98028

in Kenmore, WashingtonPopulation 23,741

67.12/ 100

Ranked #1,256 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 4.0%)

Ranked #37 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 6.4%)

Ranked #36 of 166 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

36 ppb

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$139,764

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.4%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

6.7 days/year

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.2%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.2%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Kenmore, Washington (ZIP 98028) sits in the top 4.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,256th) and the top 6.4% of Washington (37th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled obesity settles in the bottom 3.0% nationally, household income stands in the top 5.2% nationally, and modeled mobility disability is in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled short sleep rests in the bottom 3.1% nationally, humid heat sits in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and diabetes registers in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden lands in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Working the other way, lead in tap water lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 4.5% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 98011, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 41.5; chronic-disease standing 95.3 (top 10%) — 54 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,782 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 81.7 ± 1.3 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.2%19.9–22.6
High blood pressure among adults27.3%25.7–29.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.2–8.3
Current asthma among adults10.0%9.3–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Depression among adults24.8%23.1–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%33.2–36.9
Obesity among adults23.0%20.9–25.3
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.3%4.5–6.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%5.1–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.9%66.7–71.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.9%68.9–72.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.9–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%66.2–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.5%72.9–76.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%75.4–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%16.2–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults12.9%11.6–14.4
Short sleep duration among adults28.0%25.9–30.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.9%10.9–13.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.5–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults10.0%9.2–10.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.7%9.8–11.8
Any disability among adults20.8%19.2–22.5
Hearing disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
Independent living disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Mobility disability among adults7.4%6.7–8.3
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.6
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–646.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)61.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle8.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate69.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population21.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households48.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+17.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age39.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$139,764$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$920,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,949$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured