Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98006

in Bellevue, WashingtonPopulation 40,009

73.53/ 100

Ranked #126 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.4%)

Ranked #6 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 1.1%)

Ranked #6 of 166 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA ZIPs (top 3.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$198,150

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

18.7%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

6.7%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

4.1%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.4%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

4.9 days/year

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

10.7%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.1%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 98006, one of several in Bellevue, Washington, by its composite score, sits in the top 0.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (126th) and the top 1.1% of Washington (6th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: household income lies in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled obesity rests in the bottom 0.6% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and independent living disability is in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the bottom 1.1% nationally, humid heat stands in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and fair or poor health registers in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Fatal road crashes settles in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 3.0% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 98004, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.2 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $198,150 predicts 82.8 years — 1.4 years above.

    Ranked #1,294 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.2 ± 1.4 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.6 years — 2.6 years above them.

    Ranked #1,054 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.7%18.4–21.0
High blood pressure among adults27.6%25.9–29.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.7–7.7
Current asthma among adults8.6%7.9–9.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.1%3.7–4.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Depression among adults19.8%18.4–21.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.0%7.3–8.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%35.6–39.4
Obesity among adults18.7%16.9–20.6
Stroke among adults2.2%2.1–2.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.0%4.3–5.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.6%4.0–5.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.8%69.7–73.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%71.5–75.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.9–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%62.5–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.5%72.8–76.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%74.5–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%12.9–15.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults12.9%11.7–14.3
Short sleep duration among adults28.1%26.0–30.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.7%9.8–11.7
Frequent mental distress among adults11.8%10.9–12.7
Frequent physical distress among adults8.7%8.0–9.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.4%7.7–9.1
Any disability among adults18.0%16.7–19.5
Hearing disability among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
Independent living disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Mobility disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Self-care disability among adults2.0%1.8–2.2
Vision disability among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–644.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)72.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription98.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate79.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population38.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households48.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age42.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$198,150$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$1,388,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$2,836$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.2 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 84.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured