Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

97470

in Roseburg, OregonPopulation 19,711

44.78/ 100

Ranked #22,640 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #296 of 407 Oregon ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

42.8 per million

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.79 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.3%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

274 units

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.9 pCi/L

in the bottom 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US13th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 97470, one of several in Roseburg, Oregon sits in the bottom 29% nationally (22,640th) and the bottom 27% of Oregon (296th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 1.7% nationally, fine-particle settles in the top 7.6% nationally, and loud transportation noise stands in the top 13.3% nationally. More positively, civic is in the top 6.3% nationally, subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 9.0% nationally, and transit sits in the top 9.9% nationally. Elder services registers in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Outpatient resides in the top 11.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs.

In plain language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. ZIP 97443, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.3 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $54,751 predicts 77.7 years — 1.4 years below.

    Ranked #1,775 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 42.8 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.3 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #332 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.1%29.9–36.5
High blood pressure among adults38.0%34.2–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.4
Current asthma among adults13.2%11.8–14.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Depression among adults28.2%24.7–32.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.1–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.1–42.0
Obesity among adults38.3%32.4–44.8
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.4%11.7–17.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%7.9–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%70.4–76.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.7%71.2–78.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%81.0–84.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%57.0–67.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.4%56.6–64.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%68.8–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%11.9–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.5–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%22.2–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%28.2–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.0%21.3–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.9–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.9%15.1–18.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.5%15.6–19.5
Any disability among adults36.8%32.8–41.0
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Independent living disability among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Mobility disability among adults17.6%15.5–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.7% (4.7–26.4%) n=411
Uninsured 18–6410.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.9% (0.9–19.7%) n=411
No HS diploma (25+)10.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (1.2–16.6%) n=412
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.7% (11.1–49.6%) n=412
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–10.0%) n=409
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–10.0%) n=410
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (76.7–96.9%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (14.6–42.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate59.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.5% (52.8–90.2%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–6.7%) n=410
Foreign-born population4.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.0% (0.0–13.0%) n=412
Single-parent households46.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.5% (43.5–77.1%) n=407
Population 65+22.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.5% (12.7–42.1%) n=412
Median age40.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.1 yr (36.3–62.2) n=410
Median household income$54,751$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,301 ($49,007–$109,558) n=378
Median home value$260,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$413,900 ($238,120–$653,360) n=374
Median gross rent$1,101$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,252 ($807–$1,772) n=327
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.1 yr (76.4–82.0) n=409

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured