Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

97048

in Rainier, OregonPopulation 7,099

45.66/ 100

Ranked #21,705 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #270 of 407 Oregon ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #113 of 120 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA ZIPs (bottom 5.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

6.7%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.2 days/year

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Rainier, Oregon (ZIP 97048) sits in the bottom 32% nationally (21,705th) and the bottom 34% of Oregon (270th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled pfas settles in the bottom 3.0% nationally, modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 7.2% nationally, and grocery is in the top 12.5% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 16% nationally, and tree cover sits in the top 19% nationally. On the other hand, modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 10.8% nationally, and disaster risk lands in the top 16% nationally. Unemployment resides in the top 16% nationally, and crowded housing lies in the top 17% nationally. Physicians settles at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 97016, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.9%33.2–38.5
High blood pressure among adults39.8%36.8–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%10.1–11.6
Current asthma among adults12.7%11.6–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.4–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.3–11.5
Depression among adults27.8%25.0–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%13.3–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%34.3–40.3
Obesity among adults35.6%30.7–40.4
Stroke among adults4.6%4.3–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.8%14.7–21.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%7.3–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%73.3–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.0%71.1–76.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.4%82.9–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%60.3–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.0%56.3–63.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%66.8–81.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%12.0–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.7–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%22.3–28.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%27.5–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.9%21.5–26.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.9–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.6–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%15.0–18.3
Any disability among adults34.5%31.2–37.8
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.4–10.1
Independent living disability among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Mobility disability among adults18.0%16.2–19.9
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.7% (4.7–26.4%) n=411
Uninsured 18–6410.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.9% (0.9–19.7%) n=411
No HS diploma (25+)8.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (1.2–16.6%) n=412
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.7% (11.1–49.6%) n=412
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–10.0%) n=409
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–10.0%) n=410
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (76.7–96.9%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (14.6–42.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate78.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.5% (52.8–90.2%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–6.7%) n=410
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.0% (0.0–13.0%) n=412
Single-parent households53.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.5% (43.5–77.1%) n=407
Population 65+24.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.5% (12.7–42.1%) n=412
Median age45.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.1 yr (36.3–62.2) n=410
Median household income$77,171$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,301 ($49,007–$109,558) n=378
Median home value$368,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$413,900 ($238,120–$653,360) n=374
Median gross rent$969$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,252 ($807–$1,772) n=327
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.1 yr (76.4–82.0) n=409

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured