Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96795

in Waimanalo, HawaiiPopulation 10,675

52.09/ 100

Ranked #13,335 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #70 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #30 of 33 Urban Honolulu, HI ZIPs (bottom 9.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

51.2%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

16.6%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

5.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$120,714

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Waimanalo, Hawaii (ZIP 96795) lands in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,335th) and the bottom 24% of Hawaii (70th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and transit rests in the top 4.3% nationally. Lead in tap water stands at the national minimum, and household income lies in the top 9.4% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled short sleep sits in the top 0.2% nationally, crowded housing is in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled disaster risk settles in the top 4.9% nationally. PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum, and modeled binge drinking registers in the top 6.2% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 96734, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

22%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

9%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

6%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 39%

8%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $120,714 predicts 80.8 years — 4.6 years below.

    Ranked #5,400 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.7 years. The 41 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.2 years — 5.1 years below them.

    Ranked #3,390 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%23.1–27.7
High blood pressure among adults33.8%30.9–36.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.5%6.0–7.1
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.9–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Depression among adults17.7%15.4–20.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.3–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%32.1–38.2
Obesity among adults34.3%29.3–39.4
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.5–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.5–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.3%72.6–77.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.5%73.4–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults80.1%78.1–82.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%63.8–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.3%66.4–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%72.8–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.0%17.5–22.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%21.8–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults51.2%46.5–56.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%20.3–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.2–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%13.2–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%14.1–17.4
Any disability among adults33.8%30.6–37.0
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.7–17.8
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.9–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.1%29.0–35.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.3%20.0–24.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.9–18.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.9–17.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.6–10.8
Loneliness among adults34.5%31.1–37.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.1–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–642.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate77.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)16.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households52.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age39.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$120,714$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$821,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$1,684$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured