Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29472

in Ridgeville, South CarolinaPopulation 12,722

48.31/ 100

Ranked #18,536 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #186 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #33 of 45 Charleston-North Charleston, SC ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

69.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

0.96%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

132.8 days/year

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

30.7%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Ridgeville, South Carolina (ZIP 29472) ranks in the bottom 42% nationally (18,536th) and the top 45% of South Carolina (186th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: fatal road crashes resides in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled humid heat stands in the top 9.2% nationally. Floodplain exposure sits in the top 9.7% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 10.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the top 12.7% nationally, and housing insecurity sits in the top 16% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 1.5% nationally, pfas stands in the bottom 10.1% nationally, and radon sits in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Unemployment resides in the bottom 15% nationally.

For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 29448, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charleston-North Charleston, SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.7 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $75,325 predicts 79.0 years — 2.3 years below.

    Ranked #3,121 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.5%24.3–28.6
High blood pressure among adults40.7%37.8–43.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.7–7.8
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.3–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Depression among adults20.7%18.5–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.9–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%34.1–39.7
Obesity among adults39.7%35.3–44.1
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.8%15.7–20.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.7%11.9–15.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.9–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%77.4–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.3–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.7%61.2–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.3%54.7–60.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%69.4–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%14.0–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%15.1–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%25.8–32.2
Short sleep duration among adults41.0%37.1–45.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.6%20.6–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.5–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.5–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.9–16.8
Any disability among adults32.7%29.7–35.7
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.3
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Mobility disability among adults16.3%14.8–17.9
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.7–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%24.8–30.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.9%18.6–23.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.8–14.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.3%14.6–18.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Loneliness among adults32.9%29.8–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6413.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)18.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)0.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription83.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate84.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population4.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households50.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+13.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age39.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$75,325$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$263,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$996$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured