Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96791

in Waialua, HawaiiPopulation 6,377

57.35/ 100

Ranked #6,939 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #46 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #23 of 33 Urban Honolulu, HI ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

48.8%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Park land

29.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

15.6 per million

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.1%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

13.5 mi

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

40.1%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Waialua, Hawaii (ZIP 96791) lands in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,939th) and the top 50% of Hawaii (46th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: lead in tap water is at the national minimum, and park land settles in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and transit registers in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled obesity rests in the bottom 10.7% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 9.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled short sleep lies in the top 0.6% nationally, modeled disaster risk lands in the top 2.4% nationally, and crowded housing sits in the top 8.3% nationally. Housing-cost burden is in the top 9.9% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 96857, about 0.4 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

22%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

9%

Disability

healthier than 69%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

6%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.7 ± 2.2 years. A median household income of $97,470 predicts 80.0 years — 3.7 years above.

    Ranked #232 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.8%20.6–25.1
High blood pressure among adults31.2%28.4–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.5%6.0–7.1
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Depression among adults17.7%15.3–20.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%32.3–38.5
Obesity among adults27.7%23.2–32.3
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.4%6.8–10.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.4–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%73.2–78.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%74.4–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults82.0%80.1–83.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%60.5–68.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.5%64.5–70.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%72.5–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%16.7–21.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.8–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%20.2–26.7
Short sleep duration among adults48.8%44.0–53.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%16.7–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%14.3–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.2–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%12.0–14.9
Any disability among adults29.4%26.4–32.5
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.1
Mobility disability among adults13.1%11.7–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.7%26.7–32.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.5%15.6–19.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.6–14.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Loneliness among adults32.2%28.9–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–646.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)4.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription90.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate64.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population20.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households52.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+24.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age47.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$97,470$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$977,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$2,179$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.7 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 83.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured