Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08326

in Landisville, New JerseyPopulation 1,435

60.46/ 100

Ranked #4,505 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.1%)

Ranked #368 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #19 of 40 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

79.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.1 mi

in the bottom 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.63 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

4.4 mi

in the top 35% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US65th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Landisville, New Jersey (ZIP 08326) sits in the top 14.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,505th) and the bottom 37% of New Jersey (368th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: fatal road crashes settles at the national minimum, floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, and civic rests in the top 9.1% nationally. Lead in tap water settles in the bottom 12.2% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 13.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled pfas rests in the top 2.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 3.9% nationally. Fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Crowded housing rests in the top 10.2% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 10.8% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 08080, about 12 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.5%19.1–24.0
High blood pressure among adults31.6%28.3–34.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–10.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.2–6.0
Depression among adults16.0%13.7–18.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.4–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%35.4–42.7
Obesity among adults30.8%25.8–36.1
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.5–12.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.9%12.1–18.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.5–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.3–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%86.9–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%60.3–69.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.4%62.1–68.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%69.1–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%13.9–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%9.7–14.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.1%22.0–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%32.1–42.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.5–21.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.2–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.0–14.9
Any disability among adults26.2%22.5–30.1
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Independent living disability among adults6.8%5.9–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.4%9.7–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.4%2.9–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.9%21.4–28.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.2–18.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.4–9.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.7–16.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.2
Loneliness among adults32.6%28.2–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–6413.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)9.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle7.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription92.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate78.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population13.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households35.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age38.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$79,583$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$276,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,412$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.4778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.47 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured