Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96764

in Laupahoehoe, HawaiiPopulation 516

50.85/ 100

Ranked #15,083 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #76 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

198.3 mi

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

17%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

12.7 mi

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

28.5%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

13.1 mi

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US81st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$55,769

in the bottom 22% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Laupahoehoe, Hawaii (ZIP 96764) lands in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,083rd) and the bottom 17% of Hawaii (76th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 1.1% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss sits in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 9.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. On the other side, unemployment rests in the top 2.9% nationally, and distance to a nursing home registers in the top 7.3% nationally. Poverty resides in the top 7.9% nationally, and crowded housing settles in the top 11.0% nationally.

Put simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. On the overall standing, ZIP 96773, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.01%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

9%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

22%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 30%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%27.8–33.6
High blood pressure among adults33.9%30.7–37.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.9–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.4–10.0
Depression among adults20.5%17.9–23.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%33.3–40.3
Obesity among adults29.2%24.5–34.4
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.5%8.7–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.4–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.0–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.6%73.4–79.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.7%81.7–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.7%61.7–69.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.6%59.2–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.0%65.9–77.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%14.5–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%14.8–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.7%21.0–28.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%33.2–42.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.2%20.3–26.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.7–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.0–16.7
Any disability among adults34.4%30.7–38.3
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Mobility disability among adults17.1%14.9–19.3
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.1%25.8–32.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.7%18.9–24.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.7%16.8–23.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%11.3–15.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–11.0
Loneliness among adults29.8%26.5–33.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.9–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–6421.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)11.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)17.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate68.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population21.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households45.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+26.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age48.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$55,769$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$610,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$1,313$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 1.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.66 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured