Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96750

in Kealakekua, HawaiiPopulation 3,203

59.33/ 100

Ranked #5,336 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #35 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

180.7 mi

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.6%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

22.8 mi

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.26 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.0%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.53 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Kealakekua, Hawaii (ZIP 96750), in overall standing, comes out in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,336th) and the top 38% of Hawaii (35th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled obesity resides in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and physicians sits in the top 3.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 3.7% nationally, lead in tap water resides at the national minimum, and elder services sits in the top 5.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Dental providers resides in the top 6.0% nationally. On the other hand, modeled disaster risk sits in the top 0.6% nationally, and crowded housing stands in the top 6.8% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 96738, about 19 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

17%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.4%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

9%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

6%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%23.1–28.3
High blood pressure among adults29.6%26.6–32.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Depression among adults18.5%16.2–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%32.1–38.8
Obesity among adults24.6%20.6–29.2
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.9%6.5–9.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.5–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.2–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.5–78.8
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.4–84.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.1%59.1–66.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.7%62.4–68.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%67.9–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.7–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.5–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.3%19.2–25.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%32.6–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%17.6–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.1–16.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.4–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%12.0–15.0
Any disability among adults30.6%27.3–33.7
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Independent living disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.7
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.2–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.1%28.0–34.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.6%16.5–21.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.3–16.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.3–13.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Loneliness among adults31.5%28.1–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.6–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)11.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate77.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population15.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households69.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+28.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age42.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$92,576$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$697,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$974$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured