Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95546

in Hoopa, CaliforniaPopulation 2,397

27.87/ 100

Ranked #31,122 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.0%)

Ranked #1,697 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 1.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

31%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

6.0%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.8%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

43.9 per million

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

28.9 mi

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

16.2%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

20%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

87.2%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Hoopa, California (ZIP 95546) sits in the bottom 3.0% nationally (31,122nd) and the bottom 1.3% of California (1,697th).

continue reading

Here the data is straightforward about what defines the area: modeled tooth loss is in the top 2.6% nationally, fine-particle lies in the top 0.8% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 1.6% nationally, distance to a nursing home lies in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 2.8% nationally. Crowded housing is in the top 1.9% nationally, and modeled transportation lies in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled vision disability registers in the top 5.1% nationally. Better still, modeled tree cover is in the top 2.2% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 95555, just across the boundary. Across other measures, the ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.7%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.1–29.9
High blood pressure among adults35.7%32.0–39.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Current asthma among adults14.4%12.9–16.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Depression among adults27.7%24.1–31.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.0%14.1–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%29.7–37.1
Obesity among adults38.2%31.4–45.2
Stroke among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.0%26.2–35.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.6–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.2%67.3–73.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.8%66.9–74.6
Cholesterol screening among adults80.4%77.7–82.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.2%48.5–59.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.2%42.2–50.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.3%59.3–76.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.6–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.8%21.3–28.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.0%25.5–35.1
Short sleep duration among adults42.8%36.0–49.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.1%28.6–36.2
Frequent mental distress among adults25.5%22.7–28.3
Frequent physical distress among adults19.9%17.7–22.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.7%19.9–25.5
Any disability among adults44.1%39.3–49.2
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Independent living disability among adults14.8%13.0–16.8
Mobility disability among adults21.6%19.1–24.5
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Vision disability among adults9.9%8.9–11.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.2%28.8–37.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.1%29.1–39.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults34.3%29.6–39.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.3%21.9–29.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults20.0%17.4–22.7
Loneliness among adults38.6%33.5–44.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.5–19.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)10.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)11.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription78.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate75.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)16.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households33.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age32.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$61,607$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$253,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$885$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 1.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.11 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured