ZIP code
95443
in Glenhaven, CaliforniaPopulation 81
42.96/ 100
Ranked #24,416 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)
Ranked #1,391 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 19%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Loud transportation noise
29.4%
in the top 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
43.5%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
87.7%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
48.8%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
37.1%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Households without a vehicle
43.5%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with no vehicle available.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
56.5%
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
56.5%
in the bottom 2.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
2.5%
in the top 3.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST71stUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Glenhaven, California (ZIP 95443) lands in the bottom 24% nationally (24,416th) and the bottom 19% of California (1,391st).
A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 0.04% nationally, and crowded housing lies in the top 0.3% nationally. Poverty lands in the top 0.4% nationally, and modeled transportation noise sits in the top 0.5% nationally. Unemployment is in the top 0.5% nationally, households without a vehicle settles in the top 1.3% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides in the top 1.6% nationally. Home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and modeled fine-particle rests in the top 3.3% nationally. On the brighter side, floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum.
Set beside the nearby areas, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 95451, about 0.4 miles away, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 65%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 82%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 84%
8%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 53%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 10%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 4%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 2%
14%
Disability
healthier than 22%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 82%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 65%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 83%
8%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 40%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 5%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 13%
14%
Disability
healthier than 21%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 14%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
95423
Californiashares a border
Score 37.69
Closest healthier
95451
Californiaabout 0.4 mi away
Score 46.21
Similar health profile
66767
Kansas93% similar profile
Score 47.22
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 37.4% | 33.0–41.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 47.9% | 43.0–52.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 13.8% | 12.3–15.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.3% | 9.0–11.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.9% | 9.2–12.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.0% | 7.9–12.4 |
| Depression among adults | 20.7% | 17.4–24.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.5% | 14.0–19.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.3% | 39.4–49.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 31.3% | 23.9–39.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.8% | 4.9–6.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 16.9% | 13.6–20.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.6% | 4.8–9.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.2% | 79.2–84.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.7% | 77.4–83.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.6% | 90.0–93.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.6% | 56.8–68.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 56.7% | 52.7–60.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.3% | 64.9–80.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.8% | 9.6–14.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.1% | 9.2–15.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 26.7% | 21.3–33.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.1% | 28.9–41.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.8% | 20.6–29.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.2% | 12.1–16.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.0% | 14.4–20.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.0% | 10.8–15.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 38.2% | 32.6–44.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.7% | 9.2–12.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.0% | 8.2–12.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.4% | 18.6–26.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.5% | 4.6–6.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.5% | 5.5–7.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.8% | 18.8–27.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.0% | 10.1–16.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 14.1% | 10.8–17.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.1% | 8.1–12.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.3% | 6.0–8.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.3% | 25.9–36.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.3% | 5.1–7.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 87.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 62.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 37.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 43.5% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 56.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 56.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 56.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 43.5% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 6.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 75.6 yr ± 1.44 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.44 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured