ZIP code
53295
in Milwaukee, WisconsinPopulation 90
35.14/ 100
Ranked #29,332 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.6%)
Ranked #759 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)
Ranked #77 of 80 Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI ZIPs (bottom 3.8%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Coronary heart disease
24%
in the top 0.02% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
11.6%
in the top 0.02% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
21%
in the top 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
31.5%
in the top 0.03% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
11.3%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
35.7%
in the top 0.07% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
64.8%
in the top 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
13.5%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
39.6%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, ZIP 53295, one of several in Milwaukee, Wisconsin lands in the bottom 8.6% nationally (29,332nd) and the bottom 0.6% of Wisconsin (759th).
Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 0.02% nationally, stroke sits in the top 0.02% nationally, and diabetes lands in the top 0.03% nationally. Modeled self-care disability lies in the top 0.3% nationally, mobility disability stands in the top 0.07% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the top 0.04% nationally. Modeled vision disability registers in the top 1.0% nationally, and unemployment resides at the national maximum. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 0.8% nationally, and tooth loss is in the top 1.2% nationally.
Against the wider neighborhood, coronary heart disease runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. On the overall standing, ZIP 53214, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 77%
13%
Mental Health
in the top 0.8%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 95%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 73%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 51%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 3%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 3%
14%
Disability
in the bottom 1.0%
7%
Lifting this score
Risk Behavior
healthier than 68%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.2%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 96%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 85%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 54%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.00%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 1%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 1%
14%
Disability
in the bottom 0.00%
7%
Lifting this score
Mental Health
in the top 0.00%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the top 0.00%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 64%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.00%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 8%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 8%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 28%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 38%
11%
Disability
in the bottom 0.00%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
53214
Wisconsinshares a border
Score 53.46
Closest healthier
53215
Wisconsinabout 0.2 mi away
Score 37.61
Similar health profile
90822
California99% similar profile
Score 33.11
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 46.9% | 43.3–50.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 64.8% | 61.7–67.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 14.6% | 13.1–16.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.1% | 8.0–10.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 24.0% | 20.0–27.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 17.9% | 13.2–22.8 |
| Depression among adults | 15.5% | 13.6–17.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 31.5% | 27.4–35.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 50.5% | 47.5–53.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 40.8% | 36.8–44.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 11.6% | 9.4–14.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 35.1% | 31.2–39.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 17.7% | 12.4–23.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 90.1% | 88.6–91.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 86.3% | 84.5–87.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 90.4% | 88.6–92.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 72.1% | 69.1–74.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 52.3% | 49.5–55.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.0% | 67.4–77.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 9.0% | 7.8–10.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.9% | 13.3–22.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 43.6% | 36.0–50.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 32.8% | 30.0–35.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 39.6% | 32.2–47.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 11.1% | 9.4–12.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 21.8% | 17.8–25.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.3% | 11.2–17.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 51.4% | 44.5–57.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 21.0% | 17.6–24.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 15.1% | 11.7–18.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 35.7% | 29.2–42.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 11.3% | 8.6–14.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 13.5% | 10.5–16.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.2% | 20.4–28.2 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 21.7% | 16.8–27.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 25.6% | 19.6–32.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.1% | 8.9–13.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.4% | 8.3–12.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 29.0% | 25.6–32.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 6.0–9.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 100.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 16.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 21.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 100.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762 |
| Population 65+ | 37.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768 |
| Median age | 53.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 44.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $914 ($696–$1,261) n=706 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured