Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95017

in Davenport, CaliforniaPopulation 616

58.70/ 100

Ranked #5,832 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #576 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #13 of 17 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

57.6 per million

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

2.2 days/year

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.6%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

37.6%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST14th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

19.5 mi

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.2%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.3%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.4%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6.9 ppb

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

US94th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Davenport, California (ZIP 95017) sits in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,832nd) and the top 34% of California (576th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 1.4% nationally, civic lands in the top 3.9% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled pfas lies in the bottom 5.5% nationally, and obesity settles in the bottom 8.0% nationally. On the other hand, modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 0.4% nationally, and loud transportation noise is in the top 2.8% nationally. Homeownership rests in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 5.3% nationally. Lead in tap water registers in the top 6.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 94060, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.5%20.6–26.8
High blood pressure among adults32.2%28.5–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.0–9.9
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.7–6.9
Depression among adults23.0%19.7–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.6–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%32.4–40.7
Obesity among adults26.4%20.9–32.8
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.1%5.7–8.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%5.9–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.9%69.5–76.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.5%68.6–76.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.0–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%61.5–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.8%64.4–71.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%68.5–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%14.8–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%8.5–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.9%15.4–23.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%26.4–37.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%15.7–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.0–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.2–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.1–14.9
Any disability among adults27.5%23.6–32.1
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.0–8.2
Mobility disability among adults12.6%10.6–15.0
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.0–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.1–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.0–12.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.3–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.9
Loneliness among adults33.2%28.3–38.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.6–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6412.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)16.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription75.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate37.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population25.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households65.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+15.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$102,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$953,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,592$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.5 yr ± 2.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.26 years of 84.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured