Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

94027

in Atherton, CaliforniaPopulation 7,002

73.25/ 100

Ranked #152 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.5%)

Ranked #20 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 1.2%)

Ranked #8 of 174 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA ZIPs (top 4.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$250,001

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

2.5%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

4.7%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

19.6%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

24%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

5.4%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

3.9%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.6%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.7%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Atherton, California (ZIP 94027) sits in the top 0.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (152nd) and the top 1.2% of California (20th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: household income lies at the national maximum, modeled utility shutoff settles in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity stands in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Modeled obesity is in the bottom 0.9% nationally, short sleep rests in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled transportation registers in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and fiber broadband lands in the top 3.2% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum, and modeled cognitive disability lies in the bottom 1.6% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, expected annual loss runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 94304, about 0.8 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 36.9; chronic-disease standing 92.3 (top 10%) — 55 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,938 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.5%20.5–26.3
High blood pressure among adults30.1%26.4–33.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.4–11.3
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.8%3.2–4.4
Depression among adults19.1%16.2–22.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.8%7.4–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%34.5–42.3
Obesity among adults19.6%15.3–24.0
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years3.0%2.3–3.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.0%2.4–3.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%73.7–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.3%71.6–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.1–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.3%67.0–75.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.3%73.4–79.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.7%74.3–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.5–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults5.2%4.1–6.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.3%11.6–17.3
Short sleep duration among adults24.0%19.8–28.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.3%10.5–14.3
Frequent mental distress among adults11.8%10.2–13.4
Frequent physical distress among adults9.4%8.1–10.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.7%7.4–10.0
Any disability among adults22.1%18.9–25.4
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Independent living disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.7
Mobility disability among adults9.6%8.1–11.3
Self-care disability among adults2.1%1.8–2.4
Vision disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.5–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.4–6.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.0–4.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults3.9%3.3–4.5
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.3–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults2.5%2.1–3.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–642.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)1.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)83.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription97.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate87.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population20.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households63.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+25.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age49.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$250,001$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$2,000,001$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$3,501$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.6 yr ± 1.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.18 years of 84.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured